CHINA FRUITS CORPORATION

CIK 0001029802

Analytics Research this company

Financial snapshot

Revenue

Net income

Operating margin

Free cash flow

Total debt

Cash

Research

Filings

Open the filing explorer →

Recent filings load as you scroll to this section.

Analytical signals

How signals work →

Calculations over this company’s filings, each compared with a stated threshold. They indicate where to read more closely; they are analytical evidence, not conclusions, and none implies wrongdoing.

Earnings quality

P-01 · Calculated

Threshold met

FY 2014-12-31

How reported earnings relate to accruals and to changes in receivables, margins and asset quality.

Beneish M-Score 3.16 is above the -1.78 cut-off used in the original study

Trend: flat

P-01 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	100.0
m_score	3.158
threshold	-1.78
ratios.DSRI	1.557
ratios.GMI	0.951
ratios.AQI	0.51
ratios.SGI	6.529
ratios.DEPI	1.155
ratios.SGAI	1
ratios.LVGI	1.137
ratios.TATA	0.095
defaulted_to_neutral	SGAI
sloan_accruals	0.1572
inputs.revenue_t	61179605
inputs.revenue_t1	9369901
inputs.total_assets_t	57769418
inputs.net_income_t	2877020
inputs.cfo_t	-2611569
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2014-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2015-05-20 Methodology

Interest coverage

P-13 · Calculated

Not comparable

FY 2014-12-31

Interest coverage: not a valid comparison for this company

Calculated, not presented as a result

The calculation is outside what this model can support: interest expense is zero or negative in a year the test counts (net interest income), so interest coverage is not defined for it.

The raw calculation is kept under Details for audit. It is not shown as a level, a score, a ranking or a multiple of a base rate.

Trend: flat

Whether operating earnings cover interest expense, and for how many consecutive years they did not.

P-13 inputs
Input	Value
icr_by_year.2014-12-31	-15.924
icr_by_year.2013-12-31	0.234
icr_by_year.2012-12-31	7.179
icr_by_year.2011-12-31	4.467
consecutive_years_below_1	2
altman_z_double_prime	0.766
definitions.zombie	ICR<1 for 3+ consecutive FYs (BIS 2018)
definitions.z_distress	<1.1 distress, 1.1-2.6 gray, >2.6 safe
inputs.ebit_t	3823412
inputs.interest_expense_t	-240102
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2014-12-31
raw_result.score	100
raw_result.level	1
raw_result.headline	Interest coverage -15.92x below 1.0
validity.status	NOT_COMPARABLE
validity.reason	interest expense is zero or negative in a year the test counts (net interest income), so interest coverage is not defined for it

Trend

10-K· 2015-05-20 Methodology

Restatement indicators

P-12 · Calculated

Outside model range

FY 2014-12-31

F-Score 12.84: outside the range in which the model is defined

Calculated, not presented as a result

The calculation is outside what this model can support: a model input is outside its defined range (change in receivables exceeds the whole asset base).

The raw calculation is kept under Details for audit. It is not shown as a level, a score, a ranking or a multiple of a base rate.

Trend: flat

How closely reported accruals and financing patterns resemble those of companies that later restated.

P-12 inputs
Input	Value
f_score	12.843
probability	0.04752
components.rsst	0.1572
components.drec	1.0701
components.dinv	0.0084
components.soft	0.9279
components.dcs	1.5424
components.droa	0.036
components.issue	0
model	Dechow et al. 2011, Model 1 (simplified RSST)
thresholds.elevated	1
thresholds.triggered	1.85
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2014-12-31
raw_result.score	100
raw_result.level	2
raw_result.headline	F-Score 12.84 — misstatement risk 12.8x the base rate
validity.status	OUT_OF_RANGE
validity.reason	a model input is outside its defined range (change in receivables exceeds the whole asset base)

Trend

10-K· 2015-05-20 Methodology

No stored result for Subsidiary jurisdictions, ESG disclosure support, Effective tax rate, Pension funding, Insider filing timing, Language change, Strategic-review language, Carbon-exposed assets. Some signals are computed on request, and others need inputs this company’s filings do not tag; a missing result is not a finding either way.

Methodology and sources

Financial figures come from SEC XBRL company facts (annual reports). Choose any evidence marker to see the filing behind a value.
Filing text comes from SEC EDGAR. Browse this company on EDGAR ↗
Signals are calculated by Stratum from those filings. Some use AI to read filing text, and every AI claim must quote the document verbatim or it is discarded. Full methodology

More tools: chat with the 10-K · generate an investigation memo