RETALIX LTD

CIK 0001064060

Analytics Research this company

Financial snapshot

Revenue

Net income

Operating margin

Free cash flow

Total debt

Cash

Research

Filings

Open the filing explorer →

Recent filings load as you scroll to this section.

Analytical signals

How signals work →

Calculations over this company’s filings, each compared with a stated threshold. They indicate where to read more closely; they are analytical evidence, not conclusions, and none implies wrongdoing.

Effective tax rate

P-05 · Calculated

Elevated

FY 2011-12-31

The gap between the effective and the statutory tax rate, and whether it persists across three years.

ETR 3.3% vs 21% statutory — gap persistent across 1 of 3 years

Trend: flat

P-05 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	0.0
etr_by_year.2011-12-31	0.033
etr_by_year.2010-12-31	0.2929
etr_by_year.2009-12-31	0.3646
statutory_rate	0.21
gap_by_year.2011-12-31	0.177
gap_by_year.2010-12-31	-0.0829
gap_by_year.2009-12-31	-0.1546
note	Low ETR can be fully legitimate; this flags persistence + magnitude for review.
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2011-12-31

Trend

20-F· 2012-04-05 Methodology

Earnings quality

P-01 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2011-12-31

Beneish M-Score -2.50 is below the reference levels used here

Trend: flat

How reported earnings relate to accruals and to changes in receivables, margins and asset quality.

P-01 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	28.7
m_score	-2.495
threshold	-1.78
ratios.DSRI	0.897
ratios.GMI	0.981
ratios.AQI	1.134
ratios.SGI	1.138
ratios.DEPI	1
ratios.SGAI	1
ratios.LVGI	1.028
ratios.TATA	-0.017
defaulted_to_neutral	DEPI, SGAI
sloan_accruals	-0.0202
inputs.revenue_t	236040000
inputs.revenue_t1	207374000
inputs.total_assets_t	332080000
inputs.net_income_t	13690000
inputs.cfo_t	20112000
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2011-12-31

Trend

20-F· 2012-04-05 Methodology

Restatement indicators

P-12 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2011-12-31

F-Score 0.53 is at or below the 1.0 reference level

Trend: flat

How closely reported accruals and financing patterns resemble those of companies that later restated.

P-12 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	17.6
f_score	0.528
probability	0.00195
components.rsst	-0.0202
components.drec	0.0037
components.dinv	0.0012
components.soft	0.8307
components.dcs	0.1325
components.droa	0.0058
components.issue	0
model	Dechow et al. 2011, Model 1 (simplified RSST)
thresholds.elevated	1
thresholds.triggered	1.85
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2011-12-31

Trend

20-F· 2012-04-05 Methodology

No stored result for Subsidiary jurisdictions, ESG disclosure support, Pension funding, Insider filing timing, Language change, Strategic-review language, Carbon-exposed assets, Interest coverage. Some signals are computed on request, and others need inputs this company’s filings do not tag; a missing result is not a finding either way.

Methodology and sources

Financial figures come from SEC XBRL company facts (annual reports). Choose any evidence marker to see the filing behind a value.
Filing text comes from SEC EDGAR. Browse this company on EDGAR ↗
Signals are calculated by Stratum from those filings. Some use AI to read filing text, and every AI claim must quote the document verbatim or it is discarded. Full methodology

More tools: chat with the 10-K · generate an investigation memo