ARRIS GROUP INC

CIK 0001141107

Analytics Research this company

Financial snapshot

Revenue

Net income

Operating margin

Free cash flow

Total debt

Cash

Research

Filings

Open the filing explorer →

Recent filings load as you scroll to this section.

Analytical signals

How signals work →

Calculations over this company’s filings, each compared with a stated threshold. They indicate where to read more closely; they are analytical evidence, not conclusions, and none implies wrongdoing.

Pension funding

P-07 · Calculated

Threshold met

FY 2013-12-31

The funded ratio of defined-benefit plans against shareholder equity.

DB plan 38% funded — -$25M deficit (2% of equity)

Trend: flat

P-07 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	71.9
benefit_obligation	40382000
plan_assets	15162000
funded_ratio	0.3755
deficit	-25220000
deficit_vs_equity	0.0191
thresholds.elevated	<90% funded
thresholds.triggered	<80% funded or deficit >25% of equity
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2014-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2014-03-03 Methodology

Effective tax rate

P-05 · Calculated

Elevated

FY 2014-12-31

The gap between the effective and the statutory tax rate, and whether it persists across three years.

ETR outside 0-100% (a tax benefit, or tax above pretax income) vs 21% statutory — gap persistent across 1 of 2 years

Trend: flat

P-05 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	100.0
etr_by_year.2014-12-31	-0.3678
etr_by_year.2012-12-31	0.2805
statutory_rate	0.21
gap_by_year.2014-12-31	0.5778
gap_by_year.2012-12-31	-0.0705
note	Low ETR can be fully legitimate; this flags persistence + magnitude for review.
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2014-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2015-02-27 Methodology

Restatement indicators

P-12 · Calculated

Elevated

FY 2014-12-31

How closely reported accruals and financing patterns resemble those of companies that later restated.

F-Score 1.24 is above the 1.0 reference level (the model's unconditional rate)

Trend: flat

P-12 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	41.3
f_score	1.239
probability	0.00458
components.rsst	null
components.drec	-0.0048
components.dinv	0.0164
components.soft	0.7865
components.dcs	null
components.droa	0.0862
components.issue	1
model	Dechow et al. 2011, Model 1 (simplified RSST)
thresholds.elevated	1
thresholds.triggered	1.85
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2014-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2015-02-27 Methodology

Interest coverage

P-13 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2014-12-31

Interest coverage 5.43x, at or above 1.0x

Trend: flat

Whether operating earnings cover interest expense, and for how many consecutive years they did not.

P-13 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	0.0
icr_by_year.2014-12-31	5.427
icr_by_year.2013-12-31	-0.265
icr_by_year.2012-12-31	4.904
icr_by_year.2011-12-31	-0.862
consecutive_years_below_1	0
altman_z_double_prime	2.752
definitions.zombie	ICR<1 for 3+ consecutive FYs (BIS 2018)
definitions.z_distress	<1.1 distress, 1.1-2.6 gray, >2.6 safe
inputs.ebit_t	341334000
inputs.interest_expense_t	62901000
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2014-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2015-02-27 Methodology

No stored result for Earnings quality, Subsidiary jurisdictions, ESG disclosure support, Insider filing timing, Language change, Strategic-review language, Carbon-exposed assets. Some signals are computed on request, and others need inputs this company’s filings do not tag; a missing result is not a finding either way.

Methodology and sources

Financial figures come from SEC XBRL company facts (annual reports). Choose any evidence marker to see the filing behind a value.
Filing text comes from SEC EDGAR. Browse this company on EDGAR ↗
Signals are calculated by Stratum from those filings. Some use AI to read filing text, and every AI claim must quote the document verbatim or it is discarded. Full methodology

More tools: chat with the 10-K · generate an investigation memo