CCO Holdings, LLC

CIK 0001271833

Analytics Research this company

Financial snapshot

Revenue

Net income

Operating margin

Free cash flow

Total debt

Cash

Research

Filings

Open the filing explorer →

Recent filings load as you scroll to this section.

Analytical signals

How signals work →

Calculations over this company’s filings, each compared with a stated threshold. They indicate where to read more closely; they are analytical evidence, not conclusions, and none implies wrongdoing.

Effective tax rate

P-05 · Calculated

Threshold met

FY 2025-12-31

The gap between the effective and the statutory tax rate, and whether it persists across three years.

ETR 0.3% vs 21% statutory — gap persistent across 3 of 3 years

Trend: flat

P-05 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	100.0
etr_by_year.2025-12-31	0.0027
etr_by_year.2024-12-31	0.0096
etr_by_year.2023-12-31	0.0028
statutory_rate	0.21
gap_by_year.2025-12-31	0.2073
gap_by_year.2024-12-31	0.2004
gap_by_year.2023-12-31	0.2072
note	Low ETR can be fully legitimate; this flags persistence + magnitude for review.
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2025-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2026-01-30 Methodology

Pension funding

P-07 · Calculated

Threshold met

FY 2025-12-31

The funded ratio of defined-benefit plans against shareholder equity.

DB plan 0% funded — -$17M deficit

Trend: flat

P-07 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	70.0
benefit_obligation	17000000
plan_assets	0
funded_ratio	0
deficit	-17000000
deficit_vs_equity	null
thresholds.elevated	<90% funded
thresholds.triggered	<80% funded or deficit >25% of equity
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2025-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2026-01-30 Methodology

Restatement indicators

P-12 · Calculated

Elevated

FY 2025-12-31

How closely reported accruals and financing patterns resemble those of companies that later restated.

F-Score 1.07 is above the 1.0 reference level (the model's unconditional rate)

Trend: flat

P-12 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	35.7
f_score	1.072
probability	0.00397
components.rsst	-0.0628
components.drec	0.0028
components.dinv	null
components.soft	0.6985
components.dcs	-0.0133
components.droa	-0.001
components.issue	1
model	Dechow et al. 2011, Model 1 (simplified RSST)
thresholds.elevated	1
thresholds.triggered	1.85
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2025-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2026-01-30 Methodology

Earnings quality

P-01 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2025-12-31

Beneish M-Score -2.64 is below the reference levels used here

Trend: flat

How reported earnings relate to accruals and to changes in receivables, margins and asset quality.

P-01 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	24.5
m_score	-2.644
threshold	-1.78
ratios.DSRI	1.144
ratios.GMI	1
ratios.AQI	0.972
ratios.SGI	0.994
ratios.DEPI	1.065
ratios.SGAI	1
ratios.LVGI	0.992
ratios.TATA	-0.062
defaulted_to_neutral	GMI, SGAI
sloan_accruals	-0.0628
inputs.revenue_t	54774000000
inputs.revenue_t1	55085000000
inputs.total_assets_t	151982000000
inputs.net_income_t	7440000000
inputs.cfo_t	16865000000
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2025-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2026-01-30 Methodology

No stored result for Subsidiary jurisdictions, ESG disclosure support, Insider filing timing, Language change, Strategic-review language, Carbon-exposed assets, Interest coverage. Some signals are computed on request, and others need inputs this company’s filings do not tag; a missing result is not a finding either way.

Methodology and sources

Financial figures come from SEC XBRL company facts (annual reports). Choose any evidence marker to see the filing behind a value.
Filing text comes from SEC EDGAR. Browse this company on EDGAR ↗
Signals are calculated by Stratum from those filings. Some use AI to read filing text, and every AI claim must quote the document verbatim or it is discarded. Full methodology

More tools: chat with the 10-K · generate an investigation memo