Generation Zero Group, Inc.

CIK 0001390072

Analytics Research this company

Financial snapshot

Revenue

Net income

Operating margin

Free cash flow

Total debt

Cash

Research

Filings

Open the filing explorer →

Recent filings load as you scroll to this section.

Analytical signals

How signals work →

Calculations over this company’s filings, each compared with a stated threshold. They indicate where to read more closely; they are analytical evidence, not conclusions, and none implies wrongdoing.

Earnings quality

P-01 · Calculated

Threshold met

FY 2014-12-31

How reported earnings relate to accruals and to changes in receivables, margins and asset quality.

Beneish M-Score 28.41 is above the -1.78 cut-off used in the original study

Trend: flat

P-01 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	100.0
m_score	28.41
threshold	-1.78
ratios.DSRI	1
ratios.GMI	1.097
ratios.AQI	0.995
ratios.SGI	36.118
ratios.DEPI	1
ratios.SGAI	0.048
ratios.LVGI	1.127
ratios.TATA	-0.13
defaulted_to_neutral	DSRI, DEPI
sloan_accruals	-0.1263
inputs.revenue_t	82385
inputs.revenue_t1	2281
inputs.total_assets_t	3021920
inputs.net_income_t	-574451
inputs.cfo_t	-182882
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2014-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2015-04-14 Methodology

Restatement indicators

P-12 · Calculated

Threshold met

FY 2014-12-31

How closely reported accruals and financing patterns resemble those of companies that later restated.

F-Score 197.83 is above the 1.85 reference level of the Dechow et al. model

Trend: flat

P-12 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	100.0
f_score	197.826
probability	0.73196
components.rsst	-0.1263
components.drec	null
components.dinv	null
components.soft	0.9891
components.dcs	35.1179
components.droa	-0.0062
components.issue	1
model	Dechow et al. 2011, Model 1 (simplified RSST)
thresholds.elevated	1
thresholds.triggered	1.85
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2014-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2015-04-14 Methodology

Interest coverage

P-13 · Calculated

Not comparable

FY 2014-12-31

Interest coverage: not a valid comparison for this company

Calculated, not presented as a result

The calculation is outside what this model can support: interest expense is zero or negative in a year the test counts (net interest income), so interest coverage is not defined for it.

The raw calculation is kept under Details for audit. It is not shown as a level, a score, a ranking or a multiple of a base rate.

Trend: flat

Whether operating earnings cover interest expense, and for how many consecutive years they did not.

P-13 inputs
Input	Value
icr_by_year.2014-12-31	8.975
icr_by_year.2013-12-31	8.602
icr_by_year.2012-12-31	0.342
icr_by_year.2011-12-31	0.105
consecutive_years_below_1	0
altman_z_double_prime	-18.453
definitions.zombie	ICR<1 for 3+ consecutive FYs (BIS 2018)
definitions.z_distress	<1.1 distress, 1.1-2.6 gray, >2.6 safe
inputs.ebit_t	-516861
inputs.interest_expense_t	-57590
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2014-12-31
raw_result.score	20
raw_result.level	1
raw_result.headline	Altman Z'' -18.45 in the distress zone
validity.status	NOT_COMPARABLE
validity.reason	interest expense is zero or negative in a year the test counts (net interest income), so interest coverage is not defined for it

Trend

10-K· 2015-04-14 Methodology

No stored result for Subsidiary jurisdictions, ESG disclosure support, Effective tax rate, Pension funding, Insider filing timing, Language change, Strategic-review language, Carbon-exposed assets. Some signals are computed on request, and others need inputs this company’s filings do not tag; a missing result is not a finding either way.

Methodology and sources

Financial figures come from SEC XBRL company facts (annual reports). Choose any evidence marker to see the filing behind a value.
Filing text comes from SEC EDGAR. Browse this company on EDGAR ↗
Signals are calculated by Stratum from those filings. Some use AI to read filing text, and every AI claim must quote the document verbatim or it is discarded. Full methodology

More tools: chat with the 10-K · generate an investigation memo