Restatement indicators
P-12 · Calculated
FY 2017-12-31
How closely reported accruals and financing patterns resemble those of companies that later restated.
F-Score 3.28 is above the 1.85 reference level of the Dechow et al. model
Trend: flat
CIK 0001435224
Recent filings load as you scroll to this section.
Calculations over this company’s filings, each compared with a stated threshold. They indicate where to read more closely; they are analytical evidence, not conclusions, and none implies wrongdoing.
P-12 · Calculated
FY 2017-12-31
How closely reported accruals and financing patterns resemble those of companies that later restated.
F-Score 3.28 is above the 1.85 reference level of the Dechow et al. model
Trend: flat
P-13 · Calculated
FY 2014-12-31
Interest coverage: not a valid comparison for this company
Calculated, not presented as a result
The calculation is outside what this model can support: interest expense is zero or negative in a year the test counts (net interest income), so interest coverage is not defined for it.
The raw calculation is kept under Details for audit. It is not shown as a level, a score, a ranking or a multiple of a base rate.
Trend: flat
No stored result for Earnings quality, Subsidiary jurisdictions, ESG disclosure support, Effective tax rate, Pension funding, Insider filing timing, Language change, Strategic-review language, Carbon-exposed assets. Some signals are computed on request, and others need inputs this company’s filings do not tag; a missing result is not a finding either way.
More tools: chat with the 10-K · generate an investigation memo