Restatement indicators
P-12 · Calculated
FY 2015-12-31
How closely reported accruals and financing patterns resemble those of companies that later restated.
F-Score 2.93 is above the 1.85 reference level of the Dechow et al. model
Trend: flat
CIK 0001525998
Recent filings load as you scroll to this section.
Calculations over this company’s filings, each compared with a stated threshold. They indicate where to read more closely; they are analytical evidence, not conclusions, and none implies wrongdoing.
P-12 · Calculated
FY 2015-12-31
How closely reported accruals and financing patterns resemble those of companies that later restated.
F-Score 2.93 is above the 1.85 reference level of the Dechow et al. model
Trend: flat
P-05 · Calculated
FY 2013-12-31
The gap between the effective and the statutory tax rate, and whether it persists across three years.
[FY2013 data, stale — no more recent pretax-income figure in XBRL] ETR outside 0-100% (a tax benefit, or tax above pretax income) vs 21% statutory — gap persistent across 1 of 1 years
Trend: flat
P-13 · Calculated
FY 2014-12-31
Whether operating earnings cover interest expense, and for how many consecutive years they did not.
Interest coverage 0.69x, below 1.0x
Trend: flat
P-01 · Calculated
FY 2015-12-31
Beneish M-Score -3.26 is below the reference levels used here
Trend: flat
No stored result for Subsidiary jurisdictions, ESG disclosure support, Pension funding, Insider filing timing, Language change, Strategic-review language, Carbon-exposed assets. Some signals are computed on request, and others need inputs this company’s filings do not tag; a missing result is not a finding either way.
More tools: chat with the 10-K · generate an investigation memo