Effective tax rate
P-05 · Calculated
FY 2021-12-31
The gap between the effective and the statutory tax rate, and whether it persists across three years.
ETR 2.7% vs 21% statutory — gap persistent across 3 of 3 years
Trend: flat
CIK 0000722723
Recent filings load as you scroll to this section.
Calculations over this company’s filings, each compared with a stated threshold. They indicate where to read more closely; they are analytical evidence, not conclusions, and none implies wrongdoing.
P-05 · Calculated
FY 2021-12-31
The gap between the effective and the statutory tax rate, and whether it persists across three years.
ETR 2.7% vs 21% statutory — gap persistent across 3 of 3 years
Trend: flat
P-07 · Calculated
FY 2021-12-31
The funded ratio of defined-benefit plans against shareholder equity.
DB plan 20% funded — -$14M deficit (13% of equity)
Trend: flat
P-01 · Calculated
FY 2021-12-31
How reported earnings relate to accruals and to changes in receivables, margins and asset quality.
Beneish M-Score -2.19 is above the -2.22 reference level used here
Trend: flat
P-13 · Calculated
FY 2018-12-31
Whether operating earnings cover interest expense, and for how many consecutive years they did not.
[FY2018 data, stale — no more recent EBIT figure in XBRL] Altman Z'' is below the 1.1 distress-zone cut-off
Trend: flat
P-12 · Calculated
FY 2021-12-31
F-Score 0.60 is at or below the 1.0 reference level
Trend: flat
No stored result for Subsidiary jurisdictions, ESG disclosure support, Insider filing timing, Language change, Strategic-review language, Carbon-exposed assets. Some signals are computed on request, and others need inputs this company’s filings do not tag; a missing result is not a finding either way.
More tools: chat with the 10-K · generate an investigation memo