PERRY ELLIS INTERNATIONAL, INC

CIK 0000900349

Analytics Research this company

Financial snapshot

Revenue

Net income

Operating margin

Free cash flow

Total debt

Cash

Research

Filings

Open the filing explorer →

Recent filings load as you scroll to this section.

Analytical signals

How signals work →

Calculations over this company’s filings, each compared with a stated threshold. They indicate where to read more closely; they are analytical evidence, not conclusions, and none implies wrongdoing.

Pension funding

P-07 · Calculated

Threshold met

FY 2016-01-30

The funded ratio of defined-benefit plans against shareholder equity.

[FY2016 data, stale — no more recent pension disclosure in XBRL] DB plan 61% funded — $12M surplus

Trend: flat

P-07 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	70.0
benefit_obligation	30971000
plan_assets	18864000
funded_ratio	0.6091
deficit	12107000
deficit_vs_equity	null
thresholds.elevated	<90% funded
thresholds.triggered	<80% funded or deficit >25% of equity
stale	true
latest_filing_period	2018-02-03

Trend

10-K· 2018-04-17 Methodology

Effective tax rate

P-05 · Calculated

Elevated

FY 2018-02-03

The gap between the effective and the statutory tax rate, and whether it persists across three years.

ETR outside 0-100% (a tax benefit, or tax above pretax income) vs 21% statutory — gap persistent across 2 of 2 years

Trend: flat

P-05 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	100.0
etr_by_year.2018-02-03	-0.6802
etr_by_year.2017-01-28	0.0261
statutory_rate	0.21
gap_by_year.2018-02-03	0.8902
gap_by_year.2017-01-28	0.1839
note	Low ETR can be fully legitimate; this flags persistence + magnitude for review.
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2018-02-03

Trend

10-K· 2018-04-17 Methodology

Earnings quality

P-01 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2018-02-03

Beneish M-Score -2.44 is below the reference levels used here

Trend: flat

How reported earnings relate to accruals and to changes in receivables, margins and asset quality.

P-01 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	30.4
m_score	-2.435
threshold	-1.78
ratios.DSRI	1.101
ratios.GMI	0.98
ratios.AQI	0.928
ratios.SGI	1.016
ratios.DEPI	0.943
ratios.SGAI	0.965
ratios.LVGI	1.067
ratios.TATA	0
defaulted_to_neutral	TATA
sloan_accruals	null
inputs.revenue_t	874853000
inputs.revenue_t1	861086000
inputs.total_assets_t	634162000
inputs.net_income_t	56650000
inputs.cfo_t	null
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2018-02-03

Trend

10-K· 2018-04-17 Methodology

Interest coverage

P-13 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2015-01-31

[FY2015 data, stale — no more recent EBIT figure in XBRL] Interest coverage 1.60x, at or above 1.0x

Trend: flat

Whether operating earnings cover interest expense, and for how many consecutive years they did not.

P-13 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	0.0
icr_by_year.2018-02-03	null
icr_by_year.2017-01-28	null
icr_by_year.2016-01-30	null
icr_by_year.2015-01-31	1.603
consecutive_years_below_1	0
altman_z_double_prime	4.158
definitions.zombie	ICR<1 for 3+ consecutive FYs (BIS 2018)
definitions.z_distress	<1.1 distress, 1.1-2.6 gray, >2.6 safe
inputs.ebit_t	22908000
inputs.interest_expense_t	14291000
stale	true
latest_filing_period	2018-02-03

Trend

10-K· 2017-04-10 Methodology

Restatement indicators

P-12 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2018-02-03

F-Score 0.58 is at or below the 1.0 reference level

Trend: flat

How closely reported accruals and financing patterns resemble those of companies that later restated.

P-12 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	19.3
f_score	0.578
probability	0.00214
components.rsst	null
components.drec	0.0271
components.dinv	0.0395
components.soft	0.8559
components.dcs	-0.0033
components.droa	0.0648
components.issue	0
model	Dechow et al. 2011, Model 1 (simplified RSST)
thresholds.elevated	1
thresholds.triggered	1.85
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2018-02-03

Trend

10-K· 2018-04-17 Methodology

No stored result for Subsidiary jurisdictions, ESG disclosure support, Insider filing timing, Language change, Strategic-review language, Carbon-exposed assets. Some signals are computed on request, and others need inputs this company’s filings do not tag; a missing result is not a finding either way.

Methodology and sources

Financial figures come from SEC XBRL company facts (annual reports). Choose any evidence marker to see the filing behind a value.
Filing text comes from SEC EDGAR. Browse this company on EDGAR ↗
Signals are calculated by Stratum from those filings. Some use AI to read filing text, and every AI claim must quote the document verbatim or it is discarded. Full methodology

More tools: chat with the 10-K · generate an investigation memo