ADIA NUTRITION, INC.

ADIACIK 0001160420

Analytics Research this company

Financial snapshot

Revenue

Net income

Operating margin

Free cash flow

Total debt

Cash

Research

Filings

Open the filing explorer →

Recent filings load as you scroll to this section.

Analytical signals

How signals work →

Calculations over this company’s filings, each compared with a stated threshold. They indicate where to read more closely; they are analytical evidence, not conclusions, and none implies wrongdoing.

Earnings quality

P-01 · Calculated

Threshold met

FY 2025-12-31

How reported earnings relate to accruals and to changes in receivables, margins and asset quality.

Beneish M-Score 92.64 is above the -1.78 cut-off used in the original study

Trend: flat

P-01 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	100.0
m_score	92.636
threshold	-1.78
ratios.DSRI	1
ratios.GMI	1.257
ratios.AQI	1.168
ratios.SGI	109.797
ratios.DEPI	0.165
ratios.SGAI	1
ratios.LVGI	2.033
ratios.TATA	-0.364
defaulted_to_neutral	DSRI, SGAI
sloan_accruals	-0.343
inputs.revenue_t	700508
inputs.revenue_t1	6380
inputs.total_assets_t	594826
inputs.net_income_t	-395464
inputs.cfo_t	-179228
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2025-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2026-03-31 Methodology

Interest coverage

P-13 · Calculated

Elevated

FY 2025-12-31

Whether operating earnings cover interest expense, and for how many consecutive years they did not.

EBIT is negative: operating earnings do not cover interest expense

Trend: flat

P-13 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	100.0
icr_by_year.2025-12-31	-11.599
icr_by_year.2024-12-31	-27.659
consecutive_years_below_1	2
altman_z_double_prime	-91.822
definitions.zombie	ICR<1 for 3+ consecutive FYs (BIS 2018)
definitions.z_distress	<1.1 distress, 1.1-2.6 gray, >2.6 safe
inputs.ebit_t	-366492
inputs.interest_expense_t	31597
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2025-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2026-03-31 Methodology

Restatement indicators

P-12 · Calculated

Outside model range

FY 2025-12-31

F-Score 270.27: outside the range in which the model is defined

Calculated, not presented as a result

The calculation is outside what this model can support: the model's probability is numerically 100%, so the score is pinned at its ceiling (1 / base rate) and no longer distinguishes inputs.

The raw calculation is kept under Details for audit. It is not shown as a level, a score, a ranking or a multiple of a base rate.

Trend: flat

How closely reported accruals and financing patterns resemble those of companies that later restated.

P-12 inputs
Input	Value
f_score	270.269
probability	1
components.rsst	-0.343
components.drec	0.0529
components.dinv	-0.2884
components.soft	0.8149
components.dcs	103.5687
components.droa	-0.393
components.issue	1
model	Dechow et al. 2011, Model 1 (simplified RSST)
thresholds.elevated	1
thresholds.triggered	1.85
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2025-12-31
raw_result.score	100
raw_result.level	2
raw_result.headline	F-Score 270.27 — misstatement risk 270.3x the base rate
validity.status	OUT_OF_RANGE
validity.reason	the model's probability is numerically 100%, so the score is pinned at its ceiling (1 / base rate) and no longer distinguishes inputs

Trend

10-K· 2026-03-31 Methodology

No stored result for Subsidiary jurisdictions, ESG disclosure support, Effective tax rate, Pension funding, Insider filing timing, Language change, Strategic-review language, Carbon-exposed assets. Some signals are computed on request, and others need inputs this company’s filings do not tag; a missing result is not a finding either way.

Methodology and sources

Financial figures come from SEC XBRL company facts (annual reports). Choose any evidence marker to see the filing behind a value.
Filing text comes from SEC EDGAR. Browse this company on EDGAR ↗
Signals are calculated by Stratum from those filings. Some use AI to read filing text, and every AI claim must quote the document verbatim or it is discarded. Full methodology

More tools: chat with the 10-K · generate an investigation memo