Hillman Solutions Corp.

HLMNCIK 0001822492

Analytics Research this company

Financial snapshot

Revenue

Net income

Operating margin

Free cash flow

Total debt

Cash

Research

Filings

Open the filing explorer →

Recent filings load as you scroll to this section.

Analytical signals

How signals work →

Calculations over this company’s filings, each compared with a stated threshold. They indicate where to read more closely; they are analytical evidence, not conclusions, and none implies wrongdoing.

Earnings quality

P-01 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2025-12-27

Beneish M-Score -2.58 is below the reference levels used here

Trend: flat

How reported earnings relate to accruals and to changes in receivables, margins and asset quality.

P-01 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	26.4
m_score	-2.575
threshold	-1.78
ratios.DSRI	0.993
ratios.GMI	1
ratios.AQI	0.954
ratios.SGI	1.054
ratios.DEPI	0.969
ratios.SGAI	0.975
ratios.LVGI	0.969
ratios.TATA	-0.028
defaulted_to_neutral	GMI
sloan_accruals	-0.0277
inputs.revenue_t	1552224000
inputs.revenue_t1	1472595000
inputs.total_assets_t	2356194000
inputs.net_income_t	40305000
inputs.cfo_t	105185000
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2025-12-27

Trend

10-K· 2026-02-17 Methodology

Effective tax rate

P-05 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2025-12-27

ETR 28.8% — within normal range of statutory

Trend: flat

The gap between the effective and the statutory tax rate, and whether it persists across three years.

P-05 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	0.0
etr_by_year.2025-12-27	0.2878
etr_by_year.2024-12-28	0.3501
statutory_rate	0.21
gap_by_year.2025-12-27	-0.0778
gap_by_year.2024-12-28	-0.1401
note	Low ETR can be fully legitimate; this flags persistence + magnitude for review.
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2025-12-27

Trend

10-K· 2026-02-17 Methodology

Restatement indicators

P-12 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2025-12-27

F-Score 0.60 is at or below the 1.0 reference level

Trend: flat

How closely reported accruals and financing patterns resemble those of companies that later restated.

P-12 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	20.0
f_score	0.601
probability	0.00222
components.rsst	-0.0277
components.drec	0.0022
components.dinv	0.0351
components.soft	0.8902
components.dcs	0.0506
components.droa	0.0097
components.issue	0
model	Dechow et al. 2011, Model 1 (simplified RSST)
thresholds.elevated	1
thresholds.triggered	1.85
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2025-12-27

Trend

10-K· 2026-02-17 Methodology

No stored result for Subsidiary jurisdictions, ESG disclosure support, Pension funding, Insider filing timing, Language change, Strategic-review language, Carbon-exposed assets, Interest coverage. Some signals are computed on request, and others need inputs this company’s filings do not tag; a missing result is not a finding either way.

Methodology and sources

Financial figures come from SEC XBRL company facts (annual reports). Choose any evidence marker to see the filing behind a value.
Filing text comes from SEC EDGAR. Browse this company on EDGAR ↗
Signals are calculated by Stratum from those filings. Some use AI to read filing text, and every AI claim must quote the document verbatim or it is discarded. Full methodology

More tools: chat with the 10-K · generate an investigation memo