Organon & Co.

OGNCIK 0001821825

Analytics Research this company

Financial snapshot

Revenue

Net income

Operating margin

Free cash flow

Total debt

Cash

Research

Filings

Open the filing explorer →

Recent filings load as you scroll to this section.

Analytical signals

How signals work →

Calculations over this company’s filings, each compared with a stated threshold. They indicate where to read more closely; they are analytical evidence, not conclusions, and none implies wrongdoing.

Pension funding

P-07 · Calculated

Threshold met

FY 2025-12-31

The funded ratio of defined-benefit plans against shareholder equity.

DB plan 78% funded — -$59M deficit (8% of equity)

Trend: flat

P-07 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	52.5
benefit_obligation	264000000
plan_assets	205000000
funded_ratio	0.7765
deficit	-59000000
deficit_vs_equity	0.0785
thresholds.elevated	<90% funded
thresholds.triggered	<80% funded or deficit >25% of equity
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2025-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2026-02-24 Methodology

Effective tax rate

P-05 · Calculated

Elevated

FY 2025-12-31

The gap between the effective and the statutory tax rate, and whether it persists across three years.

ETR 56.0% vs 21% statutory — gap persistent across 2 of 3 years

Trend: flat

P-05 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	100.0
etr_by_year.2025-12-31	0.56
etr_by_year.2024-12-31	-0.0706
etr_by_year.2023-12-31	-0.5201
statutory_rate	0.21
gap_by_year.2025-12-31	-0.35
gap_by_year.2024-12-31	0.2806
gap_by_year.2023-12-31	0.7301
note	Low ETR can be fully legitimate; this flags persistence + magnitude for review.
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2025-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2026-02-24 Methodology

Restatement indicators

P-12 · Calculated

Elevated

FY 2025-12-31

How closely reported accruals and financing patterns resemble those of companies that later restated.

F-Score 1.54 is above the 1.0 reference level (the model's unconditional rate)

Trend: flat

P-12 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	51.5
f_score	1.545
probability	0.00572
components.rsst	-0.0395
components.drec	-0.0021
components.dinv	0.0065
components.soft	0.8541
components.dcs	-0.025
components.droa	-0.0514
components.issue	1
model	Dechow et al. 2011, Model 1 (simplified RSST)
thresholds.elevated	1
thresholds.triggered	1.85
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2025-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2026-02-24 Methodology

Earnings quality

P-01 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2025-12-31

Beneish M-Score -2.65 is below the reference levels used here

Trend: flat

How reported earnings relate to accruals and to changes in receivables, margins and asset quality.

P-01 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	24.4
m_score	-2.647
threshold	-1.78
ratios.DSRI	1.01
ratios.GMI	1.089
ratios.AQI	0.968
ratios.SGI	0.971
ratios.DEPI	0.95
ratios.SGAI	1.007
ratios.LVGI	0.969
ratios.TATA	-0.04
defaulted_to_neutral
sloan_accruals	-0.0395
inputs.revenue_t	6216000000
inputs.revenue_t1	6403000000
inputs.total_assets_t	12867000000
inputs.net_income_t	187000000
inputs.cfo_t	700000000
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2025-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2026-02-24 Methodology

No stored result for Subsidiary jurisdictions, ESG disclosure support, Insider filing timing, Language change, Strategic-review language, Carbon-exposed assets, Interest coverage. Some signals are computed on request, and others need inputs this company’s filings do not tag; a missing result is not a finding either way.

Methodology and sources

Financial figures come from SEC XBRL company facts (annual reports). Choose any evidence marker to see the filing behind a value.
Filing text comes from SEC EDGAR. Browse this company on EDGAR ↗
Signals are calculated by Stratum from those filings. Some use AI to read filing text, and every AI claim must quote the document verbatim or it is discarded. Full methodology

More tools: chat with the 10-K · generate an investigation memo