TOYOTA MOTOR CORP/

TMCIK 0001094517

Analytics Research this company

Financial snapshot

Revenue

Net income

Operating margin

Free cash flow

Total debt

Cash

Research

Filings

Open the filing explorer →

Recent filings load as you scroll to this section.

Analytical signals

How signals work →

Calculations over this company’s filings, each compared with a stated threshold. They indicate where to read more closely; they are analytical evidence, not conclusions, and none implies wrongdoing.

Pension funding

P-07 · Calculated

Threshold met

FY 2012-03-31

The funded ratio of defined-benefit plans against shareholder equity.

[FY2012 data, stale — no more recent pension disclosure in XBRL] DB plan 65% funded — -$8,232M deficit (6% of equity)

Trend: flat

P-07 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	75.9
benefit_obligation	23693000000
plan_assets	15461000000
funded_ratio	0.6526
deficit	-8232000000
deficit_vs_equity	0.0641
thresholds.elevated	<90% funded
thresholds.triggered	<80% funded or deficit >25% of equity
stale	true
latest_filing_period	2020-03-31

Trend

20-F· 2012-06-25 Methodology

Restatement indicators

P-12 · Calculated

Elevated

FY 2013-03-31

How closely reported accruals and financing patterns resemble those of companies that later restated.

[FY2013 data, stale] F-Score 1.20 is above the 1.0 reference level (the model's unconditional rate)

Trend: flat

P-12 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	40.1
f_score	1.202
probability	0.00445
components.rsst	-0.0422
components.drec	null
components.dinv	-0.004
components.soft	0.7585
components.dcs	0.0376
components.droa	0.0179
components.issue	1
model	Dechow et al. 2011, Model 1 (simplified RSST)
thresholds.elevated	1
thresholds.triggered	1.85
stale	true
latest_filing_period	2020-03-31

Trend

20-F· 2013-06-24 Methodology

Earnings quality

P-01 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2013-03-31

[FY2013 data, stale] Beneish M-Score -2.69 is below the reference levels used here

Trend: flat

How reported earnings relate to accruals and to changes in receivables, margins and asset quality.

P-01 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	23.3
m_score	-2.685
threshold	-1.78
ratios.DSRI	1
ratios.GMI	0.817
ratios.AQI	1.06
ratios.SGI	1.038
ratios.DEPI	1.053
ratios.SGAI	0.963
ratios.LVGI	0.947
ratios.TATA	-0.042
defaulted_to_neutral	DSRI
sloan_accruals	-0.0422
inputs.revenue_t	234601000000
inputs.revenue_t1	226106000000
inputs.total_assets_t	377281000000
inputs.net_income_t	10230000000
inputs.cfo_t	26064000000
stale	true
latest_filing_period	2020-03-31

Trend

20-F· 2013-06-24 Methodology

Effective tax rate

P-05 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2013-03-31

[FY2013 data, stale — no more recent pretax-income figure in XBRL] ETR 39.3% — within normal range of statutory

Trend: flat

The gap between the effective and the statutory tax rate, and whether it persists across three years.

P-05 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	0.0
etr_by_year.2013-03-31	0.393
etr_by_year.2012-03-31	0.6058
etr_by_year.2011-03-31	0.5554
statutory_rate	0.21
gap_by_year.2013-03-31	-0.183
gap_by_year.2012-03-31	-0.3958
gap_by_year.2011-03-31	-0.3454
note	Low ETR can be fully legitimate; this flags persistence + magnitude for review.
stale	true
latest_filing_period	2020-03-31

Trend

20-F· 2013-06-24 Methodology

Interest coverage

P-13 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2013-03-31

[FY2013 data, stale — no more recent EBIT figure in XBRL] Interest coverage 57.56x, at or above 1.0x

Trend: flat

Whether operating earnings cover interest expense, and for how many consecutive years they did not.

P-13 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	0.0
icr_by_year.2013-03-31	57.561
icr_by_year.2012-03-31	15.509
icr_by_year.2011-03-31	15.955
icr_by_year.2010-03-31	4.418
consecutive_years_below_1	0
altman_z_double_prime	2.139
definitions.zombie	ICR<1 for 3+ consecutive FYs (BIS 2018)
definitions.z_distress	<1.1 distress, 1.1-2.6 gray, >2.6 safe
inputs.ebit_t	14045000000
inputs.interest_expense_t	244000000
stale	true
latest_filing_period	2020-03-31

Trend

20-F· 2013-06-24 Methodology

No stored result for Subsidiary jurisdictions, ESG disclosure support, Insider filing timing, Language change, Strategic-review language, Carbon-exposed assets. Some signals are computed on request, and others need inputs this company’s filings do not tag; a missing result is not a finding either way.

Methodology and sources

Financial figures come from SEC XBRL company facts (annual reports). Choose any evidence marker to see the filing behind a value.
Filing text comes from SEC EDGAR. Browse this company on EDGAR ↗
Signals are calculated by Stratum from those filings. Some use AI to read filing text, and every AI claim must quote the document verbatim or it is discarded. Full methodology

More tools: chat with the 10-K · generate an investigation memo