Tesla, Inc.

TSLACIK 0001318605

Analytics Research this company

Financial snapshot

Revenue

Net income

Operating margin

Free cash flow

Total debt

Cash

Research

Filings

Open the filing explorer →

Recent filings load as you scroll to this section.

Analytical signals

How signals work →

Calculations over this company’s filings, each compared with a stated threshold. They indicate where to read more closely; they are analytical evidence, not conclusions, and none implies wrongdoing.

Subsidiary jurisdictions

P-02 · Calculated

Elevated

FY 2026-01-29

Where the company's significant subsidiaries are domiciled, compared with a configurable list of jurisdictions.

53 subsidiary mention(s) in watchlist jurisdictions (14% of jurisdiction mentions)

P-02 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	100.0
exhibit	tsla-2025x12x31xex211.htm
filing_date	2026-01-29
watchlist	China, Russia, Belarus, Iran, North Korea
watchlist_mentions.China	53
all_jurisdiction_mentions.Delaware	233
all_jurisdiction_mentions.China	53
all_jurisdiction_mentions.Germany	10
all_jurisdiction_mentions.Mexico	10
all_jurisdiction_mentions.Netherlands	9
all_jurisdiction_mentions.Canada	9
all_jurisdiction_mentions.France	6
all_jurisdiction_mentions.Australia	6
all_jurisdiction_mentions.Singapore	4
all_jurisdiction_mentions.Hong Kong	3
all_jurisdiction_mentions.United Kingdom	3
all_jurisdiction_mentions.Taiwan	2
all_jurisdiction_mentions.India	2
all_jurisdiction_mentions.Ireland	2
all_jurisdiction_mentions.Luxembourg	2
all_jurisdiction_mentions.Switzerland	2
all_jurisdiction_mentions.Japan	2
all_jurisdiction_mentions.Cayman Islands	2
all_jurisdiction_mentions.Thailand	2
all_jurisdiction_mentions.Philippines	2
note	Mention-count proxy from EX-21; ownership %, revenue share and supply relationships require the LLM enrichment phase.

Basis: Exhibit 21Methodology

Carbon-exposed assets

P-11 · AI-assisted, quote-verified

Below threshold

FY 2026-01-29

No carbon-exposed asset language detected

How asset-heavy the balance sheet is, and whether the filing names carbon-exposed asset classes.

P-11 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	0.0
exposures
ppe_share_of_assets	null
quotes_discarded_unverified	0

Basis: Filing text (AI-assisted, quote-verified)Methodology

Earnings quality

P-01 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2025-12-31

Beneish M-Score -2.36 is below the reference levels used here

Trend: flat

How reported earnings relate to accruals and to changes in receivables, margins and asset quality.

P-01 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	32.6
m_score	-2.358
threshold	-1.78
ratios.DSRI	1.067
ratios.GMI	0.991
ratios.AQI	2.198
ratios.SGI	0.971
ratios.DEPI	1
ratios.SGAI	1.167
ratios.LVGI	0.975
ratios.TATA	-0.079
defaulted_to_neutral	DEPI
sloan_accruals	-0.0843
inputs.revenue_t	94827000000
inputs.revenue_t1	97690000000
inputs.total_assets_t	137806000000
inputs.net_income_t	3794000000
inputs.cfo_t	14747000000
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2025-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2026-01-29 Methodology

Effective tax rate

P-05 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2025-12-31

ETR 27.0% — within normal range of statutory

Trend: flat

The gap between the effective and the statutory tax rate, and whether it persists across three years.

P-05 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	97.7
etr_by_year.2025-12-31	0.2696
etr_by_year.2024-12-31	0.2043
etr_by_year.2023-12-31	-0.5015
statutory_rate	0.21
gap_by_year.2025-12-31	-0.0596
gap_by_year.2024-12-31	0.0057
gap_by_year.2023-12-31	0.7115
note	Low ETR can be fully legitimate; this flags persistence + magnitude for review.
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2025-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2026-01-29 Methodology

Insider filing timing

P-08 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2026-07-22

No clustered pre-event Form 4 pattern in the last year

Whether several insiders filed Form 4 in the 14 days before recent 8-K events.

P-08 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	0.0
clusters
form4_total_1y	21
events_8k_1y	10
window_days	14
note	Timing pattern only — direction (buy/sell) requires parsing each Form 4 XML; treat as a read-the-filings triage flag, not an accusation.

Basis: Insider and event filingsMethodology

Interest coverage

P-13 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2023-12-31

[FY2023 data, stale — no more recent EBIT figure in XBRL] Interest coverage 56.99x, at or above 1.0x

Trend: flat

Whether operating earnings cover interest expense, and for how many consecutive years they did not.

P-13 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	0.0
icr_by_year.2025-12-31	null
icr_by_year.2024-12-31	null
icr_by_year.2023-12-31	56.994
icr_by_year.2022-12-31	71.497
consecutive_years_below_1	0
altman_z_double_prime	4.226
definitions.zombie	ICR<1 for 3+ consecutive FYs (BIS 2018)
definitions.z_distress	<1.1 distress, 1.1-2.6 gray, >2.6 safe
inputs.ebit_t	8891000000
inputs.interest_expense_t	156000000
stale	true
latest_filing_period	2025-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2026-01-29 Methodology

Language change

P-09 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2026-01-29

Filing language stable vs prior 10-K

How the density of uncertainty, negative and litigious wording changed between the latest and prior annual report.

P-09 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	3.8
current.filed	2026-01-29
current.tokens	57002
current.uncertainty_per_1k	14.46
current.negative_per_1k	5.25
current.litigious_per_1k	4.61
prior.filed	2025-01-30
prior.tokens	54937
prior.uncertainty_per_1k	14.02
prior.negative_per_1k	5.53
prior.litigious_per_1k	4.42
ratios.uncertainty	1.031
ratios.negative	0.948
method	Loughran-McDonald dictionary densities (lite subset unless full CSV present)

Basis: Filing textMethodology

Restatement indicators

P-12 · Calculated

Below threshold

FY 2025-12-31

F-Score 0.55 is at or below the 1.0 reference level

Trend: flat

How closely reported accruals and financing patterns resemble those of companies that later restated.

P-12 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	18.5
f_score	0.554
probability	0.00205
components.rsst	-0.0843
components.drec	0.0012
components.dinv	0.0029
components.soft	0.8802
components.dcs	-0.0309
components.droa	-0.0306
components.issue	0
model	Dechow et al. 2011, Model 1 (simplified RSST)
thresholds.elevated	1
thresholds.triggered	1.85
stale	false
latest_filing_period	2025-12-31

Trend

10-K· 2026-01-29 Methodology

Strategic-review language

P-10 · AI-assisted, quote-verified

Below threshold

FY 2026-01-29

No M&A pre-signals detected

Activist 13D/13G filings, and language about strategic alternatives in MD&A and risk factors.

P-10 inputs
Input	Value
model score (0–100)	0.0
sc13d_filings
ai_signals
quotes_discarded_unverified	0
ai_status	ok
method	Deterministic 13D count + LLM language read (quote-verified)

Basis: Filing text (AI-assisted, quote-verified)Methodology

No stored result for ESG disclosure support, Pension funding. Some signals are computed on request, and others need inputs this company’s filings do not tag; a missing result is not a finding either way.

Methodology and sources

Financial figures come from SEC XBRL company facts (annual reports). Choose any evidence marker to see the filing behind a value.
Filing text comes from SEC EDGAR. Browse this company on EDGAR ↗
Signals are calculated by Stratum from those filings. Some use AI to read filing text, and every AI claim must quote the document verbatim or it is discarded. Full methodology

More tools: chat with the 10-K · generate an investigation memo